Sunday, May 25, 2014

Romney and RNC had only half the staff that Obama did leading up to Nov. 2012 election. Republicans and Romney knew Democrats had given double what they had to ground operations in states. August 2012 Republican bank balance was 7 times higher than democrats. They clearly didn't want to win-USA Today, Sept. 2012

.
9/21/12, "Romney has campaign debt, less cash on hand," USA Today, Fredreka Schouten and Christopher Schnaars

"Super PACs can raise unlimited amounts of money to aid their favorite candidates but are barred from coordinating their spending directly with candidates.

The advertising from conservative groups has focused less on making the case for a Romney presidency and more on attacking Obama's record, said Travis Ridout, a political science professor at Washington State University who tracks political advertising....

The Republican National Committee ended August with $76.6 million in cash reserves, which can be used to aid Romney in the weeks ahead although most of the spending will have to occur independently of his campaign, under federal election rules. By contrast, the DNC had just $7.1 million in available cash at the end of August.
.
The Democratic National Committee spent heavily to build field operations in August. It transferred 
more than $13.3 million
to state parties in more than a dozen battlegrounds, 

led by the Ohio Democratic Party., which received nearly $2.4 million. 


The RNC sent $6.2 million to state parties last month..
Romney built his staff in August, as he ramped up for the general-election sprint. His campaign had 403 people on the payroll in August, up from 326 a month earlier. 

Obama employed 900 people last month.


On Aug. 31, Romney gave bonuses of $10,000 or more each to nine staffers, filings show. Recipients included political director Rich Beeson, who got $37,500, and campaign manager Matthew Rhoades, who received $25,000.

In an email, Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said the payments were "primary win bonuses pursuant to employment agreements.""...




.

No comments: